“This house believes that a women’s place is at work”

by Karin on December 6, 2011 · 3 comments

This evening, Dr. Christina Hoff Sommers, a Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Linda Basch, President of the National Council for Research on Women, are participating in a debate on Women and Work sponsored by The Economist. They are debating the following motion, “This house believes that a women’s place is at work.”

Defending the motion, Basch asserts the following: “Women belong in the workplace. It is right for families, communities, the economy and, most importantly, for women so that they can live to their full potential as productive and self-reliant individuals.” Dr. Sommers is against the motion with the following position: “Women do not have an assigned place. In free societies, they choose where they wish to be. For at least 5m women in America, that happens to be in the home as full-time mothers. What is wrong with that?”

Basch goes so far as to suggest that women need to be in the workforce for the economy to turn around:

The participation of women in the formal economy is crucial for sustainable economic growth and innovation and their non-entry comes at a high cost in terms of weakened economic and social development. Although women’s presence in the workplace has increased steadily in the United States—from 33.9% of the total workforce in 1950 to 46.8% in 2010 ,—globally their participation is estimated at 40%, according to the ILO. Despite the gender employment gap, evidence points to women as increasingly important drivers of economic growth.

Sommers responds, focusing on the freedom women have today.

Furthermore, American and British women are among the freest, best-educated and most self-determining people in the world. Their consciousness has been raised. It seems more than a little matronising to suggest they have been manipulated into their life choices. In any case, on what grounds can the egalitarians deny that their own preferences are driven by just another set of internalised dogmas, stereotypes or unconscious schemas?

It is amazing how differently these two women look at the issue. It is an Oxford-style debate and you can vote here. I have heard Sommers speak before and she has really thought about these issues and knows how to argue them well. No wonder she is winning.

Previous post:

Next post:

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

William R. Smith December 7, 2011 at 2:19 pm

the only real sad part of this is that the tone of the article is that women are more fit in the office than in rasing their own children, which promotes outsourcing of the family to those who honestly don’t give a darn about the family…..which in turn is the end of the family…and that is the end of civilization. My mom stayed home until we were almost fully grown and then went back to work…a much better plan for her 4 children.

Reply

Shannon McGuire December 9, 2011 at 11:43 am

I would definitely have to agree that Sommers has thought her argument out well. In The Economist article, she referenced research and polls that did not take sides. Who is to say women staying at home have been “manipulated into their life choices” ?
Basch’s quoting the World Bank stating the economy is harmed when women stay home, only refers to a situation when “ they face discrimination in markets or societal institutions that prevents them from completing their education, entering certain occupations, and earning the same incomes as men.”
Women have the choice to work where they please. Both the Department of Labor study and the Pew Research Center survey shows the unbiased conclusion that women’s pay is influenced by their own life choices. Our culture and workforce have changed dramatically in the past decades – women have more economic opportunities than ever before. It is no uncommon occurrence for women to be the majority on college campuses. And now, each mother and father relationship can choose what they see working best for their children without anyone “manipulating” that decision.

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }